Employers should be able to ask anything they want if they allow people to opt out of answering a question.
12:12 PM | September 15, 2016
Anezka Sebek
People who have been in prison are valuable to the community for their insight. After all, they are FORMALLY discharged. They have paid their time and life to the system. Now their new life can be informed to be better teachers and workers. That life should be unfettered by prior judgment.
1:13 PM | September 12, 2016
Anezka Sebek
People who have been in prison are valuable to the community for their insight. After all, they are FORMALLY discharged. They have paid their time and life to the system. Now their new life can be informed to be better teachers and workers. That life should be unfettered by prior judgment.
1:13 PM | September 12, 2016
Anonymous
I think they should have the right, but I would like to see many forego this right.
11:11 AM | September 7, 2016
Hannah
In a very limited capacity. I don't think it should be on the initial application, but once the company has decided to interview someone, they should be able to ask about ONLY prior convictions directly related to the job and ONLY for a certain time period. (For example, applications for driving jobs asked about any DUIs in the past 5 years, teachers asked about child abuse convictions, accountants about embezzlement etc.)
7:19 PM | September 3, 2016
Melissa
I think the right should be limited to asking if they have a prior conviction based on a certain crime. For example, businesses asking if a person have been convicted of embezzlement, fraud, etc. but not when it comes to crimes such as DUI's or possession.
1:01 AM | August 11, 2016
Lauren Johnson
We have become addicted to the age of technology, unfortunately along with it, we have come to believe that not only do we have the right to know everything about everyone, but the right to judge them and make decisions about their future based on their past. If people have the opportunity to move beyond the worst choice they have made, then I presume most of them will!
12:12 PM | June 2, 2016
James Fairchild
because it negatively biases employers
7:07 AM | May 22, 2016
Jermajesty
David, even you seem to be fungible. Funny that it took the dominating presence of the neocons in Washington for the the oil companies to realize that Middle East wars are profitable. Even Daddy Bush with his close ties to the oil majors didn’t realize that and evidently they didn’t tell hiyc.Atuallm, David, what I am is an anti-termite. What you are I’ll leave for others to say.. http://trpivs.com [url=http://nqmerjpad.com]nqmerjpad[/url] [link=http://puaqqf.com]puaqqf[/link]
3:15 PM | May 8, 2016
Curtis Smeby
It would depend upon the type of employment the person is applying for and what if any are the safety and security concerns.
Aliosha Bielenberg
Employers should be able to ask anything they want if they allow people to opt out of answering a question.
12:12 PM | September 15, 2016
Anezka Sebek
People who have been in prison are valuable to the community for their insight. After all, they are FORMALLY discharged. They have paid their time and life to the system. Now their new life can be informed to be better teachers and workers. That life should be unfettered by prior judgment.
1:13 PM | September 12, 2016
Anezka Sebek
People who have been in prison are valuable to the community for their insight. After all, they are FORMALLY discharged. They have paid their time and life to the system. Now their new life can be informed to be better teachers and workers. That life should be unfettered by prior judgment.
1:13 PM | September 12, 2016
Anonymous
I think they should have the right, but I would like to see many forego this right.
11:11 AM | September 7, 2016
Hannah
In a very limited capacity. I don't think it should be on the initial application, but once the company has decided to interview someone, they should be able to ask about ONLY prior convictions directly related to the job and ONLY for a certain time period. (For example, applications for driving jobs asked about any DUIs in the past 5 years, teachers asked about child abuse convictions, accountants about embezzlement etc.)
7:19 PM | September 3, 2016
Melissa
I think the right should be limited to asking if they have a prior conviction based on a certain crime. For example, businesses asking if a person have been convicted of embezzlement, fraud, etc. but not when it comes to crimes such as DUI's or possession.
1:01 AM | August 11, 2016
Lauren Johnson
We have become addicted to the age of technology, unfortunately along with it, we have come to believe that not only do we have the right to know everything about everyone, but the right to judge them and make decisions about their future based on their past. If people have the opportunity to move beyond the worst choice they have made, then I presume most of them will!
12:12 PM | June 2, 2016
James Fairchild
because it negatively biases employers
7:07 AM | May 22, 2016
Jermajesty
David, even you seem to be fungible. Funny that it took the dominating presence of the neocons in Washington for the the oil companies to realize that Middle East wars are profitable. Even Daddy Bush with his close ties to the oil majors didn’t realize that and evidently they didn’t tell hiyc.Atuallm, David, what I am is an anti-termite. What you are I’ll leave for others to say.. http://trpivs.com [url=http://nqmerjpad.com]nqmerjpad[/url] [link=http://puaqqf.com]puaqqf[/link]
3:15 PM | May 8, 2016
Curtis Smeby
It would depend upon the type of employment the person is applying for and what if any are the safety and security concerns.
2:14 PM | April 22, 2016
Pages